ProfessorMelissa A. Hale
CaseCast™ – "What you need to know"
Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff received a bid from Defendant that was used in compiling a bid. Plaintiff was awarded the work and is suing to enforce Defendant’s bid.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. A general contractor may enforce a subcontractor’s bid where there is reasonable detrimental reliance under a theory of promissory estoppel.
Issue. Can Plaintiff enforce Defendant’s bid?
Can Plaintiff enforce Defendant’s bid as a contract?
Can Plaintiff enforce Defendant’s bid based on promissory estoppel?
Held. Yes. Plaintiff can enforce Defendant’s bid based on promissory estoppel, but not as a contract.
A general contractor cannot enforce a subcontractor’s bid as a bilateral contract or an option contract when there is no consideration.
A general contractor may enforce a subcontractor’s bid where reasonable detrimental reliance makes the offer (bid) binding. In this case, Plaintiff did not bargain for the use of Defendant’s bid. However, it was reasonable for Plaintiff to rely on Defendant’s bid in creating the bid Plaintiff submitted. In addition, Defendant’s submission of a bid was motivated by furthering its own business and Defendant’s business would only be furthered if the general contractor were awarded the job and gave the paving work to Defendant. In other words, Defendant submitted the bid to Plaintiff because Defendant wanted Plaintiff to use the bid in compiling a bid for the job.
The Court notes that had Defendant’s mistake been so obvious as to be known to Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s reliance would not have been reasonable and the bid would not be enforceable under promissory estoppel. However, under these facts, the Court does not find Plaintiff’s reliance unreasonable.
The Court also rejects Defendant’s contention that Plaintiff failed to mitigate damages. Plaintiff reasonably mitigated damages by seeking other bids from subcontractors for the paving work and accepting the lowest bid.
The essential justification for the promissory estoppel doctrine is to avoid the substantial hardship or injustice which would result if such a promise were not enforced.View Full Point of Law