To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Marrone v. Washington Jockey Club

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Property Law Keyed to Cribbet

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 22 Ill.227 U.S. 633, 33 S. Ct. 401, 57 L. Ed. 679 (1913)

Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff, who was prevented from entering a track after buying a ticket, sued the Defendant track for trespass.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. A ticket for admission upon the property of another does not create a property right in the ticket holder, and the only right of the holder is in contract.

Facts. Plaintiff was prevented from entering on the grounds of Bennings Race Track two days in a row after buying a ticket. The Plaintiff sued in trespass and also charged that the track had refused his entry because he accused the Defendants of a conspiracy to drug a horse he entered in a race. The court found that no evidence of such a conspiracy was introduced. The court found that the argument by Plaintiff was an attempt to overturn the common law rule that the purchase of a ticket does not create a property right.

Issue. Can a ticket-holder sue for trespass for being denied entry by the ticket issuer?
See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following