Henderson v. Morgan

Citation. Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 96 S. Ct. 2253, 49 L. Ed. 2d 108, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 67 (U.S. June 17, 1976)

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

CitationHenderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637, 96 S. Ct. 2253, 49 L. Ed. 2d 108, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 67 (U.S. June 17, 1976)

Brief Fact Summary. Respondent sought to have his plea agreement vacated on the grounds that it was involuntary.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. A “plea [can] not be voluntary in the sense that it constituted an intelligent admission that [the defendant] committed the offense unless the defendant received ‘real notice of the true nature of the charge against him.’”

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

That he would not have pleaded except for the opportunity to limit the possible penalty does not necessarily demonstrate that the plea of guilty was not the product of a free and rational choice, especially where the defendant was represented by competent counsel whose advice was that the plea would be to the defendant's advantage.

View Full Point of Law

Facts. Respondent was indicted for first-degree murder. He agreed to a guilty-plea of second-degree murder. He subsequently filed a habeas corpus petition on the grounds that his guilty plea was involuntary because he was not aware that “intent to cause death was an element of second-degree murder.” Based on the evidence, the District Court found that the respondent had not been properly advised.

Issue. Whether the court “should examine the totality of the circumstances and determine whether the substance of the charge.

Create New Group