Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff brought suit against Western Union, seeking recovery of lost profit, based on Defendant’s mistake in transmitting its offer to another party.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. This case stands for the proposition that a party can be held liable when, in the course of its dealings with another, it makes a mistake that causes harm to the other.
Issue. This case questions the extent of liability of a Defendant, not in privity to a contract, when his fault causes mistake between the parties and a loss to one party.
Held. Judgment for Plaintiff.
The Court held the Plaintiff could recover the difference caused by the mistake of the Defendant.
While Western Union was not a party to the contract between Plaintiff and the third party purchaser, its actions cause Plaintiff to be held to terms to which it did not agree. Because Plaintiff also had an agreement with Western Union to transmit its offer, it was not far fetched for the court to hold it liable for the damages caused by its error in transmission.
Discussion. Because Defendant, in the course of its dealings with Plaintiff, failed to perform as expected (i.e. transmit the correct message), Plaintiff was injured and it holds equitable that Defendant should pay for such mistake.