Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register
Register

United States v. Algernon Blair, Inc

Law Dictionary
CASE BRIEFS

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
AA
Font size

Contracts Keyed to Farnsworth

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 479 F.2d 638, 1973 U.S. App. 9399, 26 A.L.R. Fed. 741

Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Coastal Steel Erectors, Inc. (who brought this action under the Miller Act in the name of the United States), was a subcontractor hired by Defendant general contractor Algernon Blair, Inc. After Plaintiff completed approximately 28% of the work it contracted to do, Plaintiff terminated its performance over a dispute regarding crane rental. Plaintiff then sued to recover in quantum meruit the value of labor and equipment already furnished.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. Recovery for quantum meruit is equal to the reasonable value of performance and is not diminished by any loss that would have been sustained by complete performance.


Facts. Defendant entered into a contract with the United States to construct a naval hospital. Defendant then contracted with Plaintiff to perform steel erection and supply equipment. Plaintiff began its performance, utilizing its own cranes for handling and placing steel. Defendant refused to pay for crane rental. Plaintiff therefore terminated its performance after completing approximately 28% of the subcontract. Defendant completed the job with another subcontractor, and Plaintiff sued to recover for labor and equipment furnished.

Issue. Can Plaintiff recover in quantum meruit even though it would have lost money if it had completed performance?
See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following