Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Laclede Gas Co., contracted with Defendant, Amoco Oil Co., to supply its customers of central propane gas systems with propane. After a disagreement, Defendant attempted to terminate the agreement, stating that the agreement lacks mutuality. Plaintiff sued for specific performance, and the trial court held that there was no binding contract.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Specific performance may be ordered under the proper circumstances where the remedy at law is not adequate.
Issue. Is specific performance the proper remedy here?
Held. Yes. Specific performance may be ordered under the proper circumstances where the remedy at law is not adequate. Contrary to Defendant’s assertions, there is not a requirement that both parties be mutually entitled to the remedy of specific performance in order for one of them to be given that remedy by the Court. Further, where the public interest is involved, a court may ignore the rule that a decree of specific performance is inappropriate where constant and long-continued court supervision is required. Given that the contract is long-term and the future of worldwide energy supplies is uncertain, specific performance is appropriate here.
Mutuality of contract means that an obligation rests upon each party to do or permit to be done something in consideration of the act or promise of the other; that is, neither party is bound unless both are bound.View Full Point of Law