In re Estate of Johnson

Citation. In re Estate of Johnson, 129 Ariz. 307, 630 P.2d 1039, 1981 Ariz. App. LEXIS 431 (Ariz. Ct. App. Mar. 19, 1981)

Powered by

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

CitationIn re Estate of Johnson, 129 Ariz. 307, 630 P.2d 1039, 1981 Ariz. App. LEXIS 431 (Ariz. Ct. App. Mar. 19, 1981)

Brief Fact Summary. Arnold H. Johnson created a will on a standard blank will form where certain provisions were already in print writing and other parts were left blank. Johnson filled in the blank portions with his own handwriting. The trial court held the form did not qualify as a holographic will because the material provisions were not in Johnson’s own handwriting.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. An instrument may not be probated as a holographic will if there are words essential to the testamentary disposition that are not in the testator’s handwriting.

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

The court stated: the important thing is that the testamentary part of the will be wholly written by the testator and of course signed by him.

View Full Point of Law

Issue. Whether an instrument constitutes a valid holographic will if the words essential to proving testamentary intent are not in the testator’s own handwriting.

Held. No. The handwritten portions of the will without the printed words did not express testamentary intent because the handwritten words alone did not require that a disposition be made at death. Though the testator used the word, “estate”, the definition of that word refers to the extent of one’s interest in land or property or it can also signify the assets and liabilities left by a person at death.

Discussion. A document may not be admitted to probate as a holographic will if the handwritten portions alone do not express intent to have property distributed at death. The fact that the printed words may express testamentary intent is not enough to probate a holographic will.