Brief Fact Summary. Mr. Bet Rapp died in February 1988 survived by his wife Laura Rapp, and two children, Richard and David Rapp. Laura Rapp petitioned the probate court to reform the trust in her husband’s will so that it would qualify as a “qualified terminable interest property,” (hereinafter “QTIP”) trust. The probate court reformed the will and the tax court held the reformation was improper and that the trust property is a part of the decedent’s estate.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. The value of property passed directly from a testator to a surviving spouse is deducted before computing federal estate taxes. If the interest passing to the spouse consists only of a life estate or other terminable interest, the value of that interest is not deducted when determining the tax owed. If the terminable interest qualifies as a QTIP, the surviving spouse can elect the marital deduction as if the interest passed directly and without restraint to him or her. A probate court decision may be ignored when determining federal tax consequences if the decision is contrary to state law, even when that order is final.
Issue. Whether the California probate court’s reformation of the will is binding on a tax court for the purpose of determining the amount of federal estate taxes if the California Supreme Court did not decide the matter nor affirm the result?
Held. No. The California probate court’s reformation is not binding because the issue before the state court is a federal issue. The state court proceedings were brought for the purpose of directly affecting federal estate tax liability. Mrs. Rapp sought to modify the testamentary trust so that it would qualify as a QTIP trust under federal estate tax laws. Without a decision by the California Supreme Court, the probate court’s reformation was not binding on the tax court. The tax court was not bound by the California probate court’s reformation of Mr. Rapp’s will.
In this respect, it may be said to be, in effect, sitting as a state court.View Full Point of Law