Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

Estate of Treloar

    Brief Fact Summary. Josiah James Treloar executed a will naming his son-in-law as his executor. The children of the son-in-law sought to take a part of the Treloar’s estate as pretermitted heirs because their mother’s name was not specifically mentioned in the will.

    Synopsis of Rule of Law. The issue of a named child in a will is not precluded from taking under a pretermitted heir statute for the reason that their parents name is named when parent is only the executor, and not a beneficiary under the will.

    Facts. Treloar executed a will naming his “son-in-law, Leon Merrill of Concord, New Hampshire,” as his executor. The will did not make any devise or bequest to Merrill or his family. Merrill’s children petitioned to take a portion of Treloar’s estate as pretermitted heirs.

    Issue. Whether a will that makes reference to the testator’s son-in-law and names him by name constitutes a gift to his wife, and precludes his children from taking under a pretermitted heir statue. .

    Held. No. The gift here makes reference to the testator’s son-in-law does not include a gift to his wife and family because the will only appoints the son-in-law as the testator’s executor. The will does not make a gift to the son-in-law. Furthermore, the will does not mention the mother’s name thus the children are not excluded from taking under a pretermitted heir statue.

    Discussion. The law presumes that if a testator did not specifically disinherit any of his living children at the time that he makes a will, then the issue of those children may take as pretermitted children under the statute.


    Create New Group

      Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following