Brief Fact Summary. Steve J. Pilafas executed a will and trust that were not found among his personal effects at his death. The trial court held that Pilafas had revoked his will and trust. The remainder beneficiaries of his trust appealed the decision.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. A will is presumably revoked if it was in the testator’s possession, but not found among his personal effects at his death. If a settlor reserves the power to revoke a trust in a particular manner and under certain circumstances, he may only revoke the trust in the stated manner and under the same circumstances as stated in the trust.
Whether a will is revoked where there is evidence that the testator had the will in possession before death but the will is not found among his personal effects after his death.
Whether a trust is revoked where a settlor does not revoke the instrument in the manner provided for in the trust terms but the trust is not found among the settlor at his death.
Yes. The deceased revoked his will because there was evidence that he had possession of his will and trust before he died but it could not be found among his personal effects at death.
No. The settlor here did not revoke his trust because he did not deliver a written revocation to the trustee. The settlor reserved the right to revoke the trust by delivering a written revocation to the trustee so he could only revoke the trust in that manner. Though there may be a trend in the law to apply the law of wills to revocable trusts, those cases involved trusts that operate only after the settlor’s death. This case involves an intervivos trust where the beneficiaries are entitled to insist on full compliance with the terms of the trust interest. The beneficiaries receive a present interest in the trust property at the time of the creation of the trust.
Even a revocable trust clothes beneficiaries, for the duration of the trust, with a legally enforceable right to insist that the terms of the trust be adhered to.View Full Point of Law