Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

Aspinall v. McDonald Douglas Corp.

Citation. 625 F.2d 325 (1980)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Aspinall (plaintiff) brought suit against McDonald Douglas Corp (defendant) for wrongful death.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

In order to recover for a claim of wrongful death the beneficiary must be ones that are named in the wrongful death statute.

Facts.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant for wrongful death stemming from a plane crash. Plaintiff was not married to the decedent but he had made her the beneficiary of his will. Plaintiff sued the manufacturer of the aircraft that caused the victims death. Defendant moved for summary judgment arguing that the plaintiff had no standing to sue because under the applicable wrongful death, it is required the plaintiff and her children must be the victims heirs.

Issue.

Whether in order to recover for a claim of wrongful death the beneficiary must be ones that are named in the wrongful death statute.

Held.

Yes. In order to recover for a claim of wrongful death the beneficiary must be ones that are named in the wrongful death statute.

Concurrence.

None

Discussion.

Traditionally, under common law, plaintiffs could not recover for a tort that caused death, but more recently states have enacted statutes that do allow recovery in these situations. While the present statute does allow recover for damages stemming from a death caused by a tort, the statute is limited to the heirs of the decedent which is defined as anyone who would have inherited from the decedent. Because the plaintiff in this case would not have inherited from the victim when he died, they cannot recover or bring a cause of action for wrongful death.


Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following