Summers v. Tice

Citation. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal. 2d 80, 199 P.2d 1, 1948 Cal. LEXIS 290, 5 A.L.R.2d 91 (Cal. 1948)

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

CitationSummers v. Tice, 33 Cal. 2d 80, 199 P.2d 1, 1948 Cal. LEXIS 290, 5 A.L.R.2d 91 (Cal. 1948)

Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff was injured when he was shot in the eye during a hunting expedition. Two defendants negligently shot in his direction at the same time.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. When there is negligence by multiple parties, and one party can only have caused the plaintiff’s injury, then it is up to the negligent parties to absolve themselves if they can.

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

The injured party has been placed by defendants in the unfair position of pointing to which defendant caused the harm.

View Full Point of Law

Facts. The plaintiff was shot in the eye during a hunting trip. Both defendants shot in the plaintiff’s direction at the same time while trying to shoot a quail. The plaintiff’s injury was caused by one shot.

Issue. Whether two tortfeasors can both be liable when the injury can only have been caused by one of them.

Held. It is up to the tortfeasors to prove they were not responsible for the injury, since both were negligent towards the plaintiff.

Discussion. The plaintiff should not be deprived of his recovery from negligent defendants just because he cannot know which defendant actually shot him. Because both of the defendants were negligent and both were wrongdoers, then it is their burden to absolve themselves if they can. If the rule were that the plaintiff must choose one or the other tortfeasor and that tortfeasor escaped liability by pointing to the second tortfeasor, then second tortfeasor can do the same and leave the plaintiff without recovery.

Create New Group