To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint

Powered by
Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Flint (Plaintiff) chartered a steamboat that was repaired by Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. (Defendant). Plaintiff lost profits when Defendant took two weeks to repair the boat.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

One cannot recover lost profits from a defendant that are due to negligence by defendant against another party.

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

A tort to the person or property of one man does not make the tort-feasor liable to another merely because the injured person was under a contract with that other unknown to the doer of the wrong.

View Full Point of Law

Flint (Plaintiff) chartered a steamboat. During the steamboat’s regular cleaning, it was discovered that it needed a new propeller. The owner of the steamboat hired Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. (Defendant) to replace the propeller. Defendant dropped the initial propeller and had to make a new one which took two extra weeks. Plaintiff lost profits during those two weeks and sued Defendant to recover them.


Does Plaintiff have a right to recover lost profits from Defendant due to negligence against a third party?


No, the Court held Plaintiff cannot recover lost profits from Defendant. The Court reversed.


The Court said Defendant had no legal obligation to Plaintiff, only to the owners of the steamboat. An act of negligence to one person (the owners) does not make the Defendant liable to another because of a contract that Defendant did not know about.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following