Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff brought suit for an allegedly libelous book that was originally published at a time that would have caused the statute of limitation to have accrued, but more copies had been published since then.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Under the single publication rule, written material containing defamatory matter gives rise to only one cause of action for libel. This cause accrues at the time of the original publication, and the statute of limitation runs from that date.
Held. Yes. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment granted
* Under the common law, every sale or delivery of libelous matter was a new publication, allowing a new cause of action to accrue. Under modern conditions, this would allow for an unnecessary multiplicity of suits. The number of copies of the offending publication that are published will be a factor in determining the amount of recoverable damages. However, the original publication of the defamatory material causes the statute of limitations to run.
Discussion. This case reflects the majority rule in American jurisdictions today.