To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Gormley v. Robertson

Citation. 83 P.3d 1042 (Wash. Ct. App. 2004)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Robertson appealed the judgment of the trial court to split a property jointly owned by her and her previous partner according to the meretricious relationship doctrine.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

Same-sex relationships are included in the meretricious-relationship doctrine.


Gormley and Robertson were in a same-sex relationship and purchased a home together. Gormley and Robertson later separated and disagreed about how to split their assets. The trial court sided with Gormley in splitting the property according to the meretricious-relationship doctrine.


Whether same-sex relationships are included in the meretricious-relationship doctrine?


Yes. The meretricious relationship doctrine applies to situations where there is no lawful marriage, and therefore applies to same sex couples. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.


(Brown, C.J.) The court should affirm the judgment of the trial court based on fairness of equity rather than the meretricious-relationship doctrine.


A meretricious relationship allows a couple to acknowledge that they are not married, but they cohabit and a marital-like relationship exists between the parties.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following