To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Cheney Bros. v. Doris Silk Corp

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Property Law Keyed to Dukeminier

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 35 F.2d 279, 1929 U.S. App.

Brief Fact Summary. The Plaintiff, Cheney Brothers (Plaintiff), sought to enjoin the Defendant, Doris Silk Corporation (Defendant), from copying its dress designs during the season.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. In absence of some recognized right at common law, or under a statute, a man’s property right is limited to the actual chattels that embody his invention.

Facts. The Plaintiff, a manufacturer of silk, puts out many new patterns each year. Most patterns have a life of only a season, making it impossible to obtain a copyright or secure design patents. The Defendant copied one of the Plaintiff’s most popular designs and undercut the price. The Plaintiff sued the Defendant for damages and equitable relief under property law. The trial court dismissed the Plaintiff’s action and the Plaintiff appealed.

Issue. Does Plaintiff, absent a common law right or statute, have a property right sufficient to prevent another from copying its chattel?
See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following