Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

Sokol v. Akron General Medical Center

Citation. Sokol v. Akron Gen. Med. Ctr., 173 F.3d 1026, 1999 FED App. 0146P (6th Cir.) (6th Cir. Ohio Apr. 22, 1999)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Sokol (Plaintiff) alleged that Akron General Hospital (Defendant) had abused its discretion in placing limits on his hospital privileges.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A private hospital’s board of trustees has broad discretion when determining who will be allowed staff privileges.

Facts.

Sokol (Plaintiff) was a cardiac surgeon at Akron General Hospital (Defendant).  When informed that Sokol’s (Plaintiff) patients had a very high mortality rate, Defendant gave him notice that his privileges were being restricted.  The Hearing Committee recommended that Plaintiff’s privileges be restored.  The Medical Council rejected this recommendation and reaffirmed its original decision.  Plaintiff then sought injunctive relief from the district court.  The magistrate judge found that the Medical Council’s decision to take action against Plaintiff based on his mortality rate was arbitrary.  The Plaintiff claimed on appeal that the adverse decision was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable.

Issue.

Does a private hospital’s board of trustees have broad discretion when determining who will be allowed to have staff privileges?

Held.

(Norris, J.)  Yes.  A private hospital’s board of trustees has broad discretion when determining who will be allowed to have staff privileges.  However, the hospital must provide procedural due process in adopting and applying criteria that is reasonable and nondiscriminatory.  So long as the board of trustee’s decision was supported by evidence, the board will not have abused its discretion.  Reversed.

Dissent.

(Merritt, J.)  The heart surgeon (Plaintiff) was treated unfairly by the Akron General (Defendant). The Committee completely cleared him and there was no evidence Plaintiff made any mistakes.

Discussion.

This case is an example of hospitals using new outcome measures.  It is rather controversial for hospitals to use mortality rates and to disclose them to the public.  The court just examined the fairness of the hospital’s procedures.


Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following