Brief Fact Summary. Husband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage claiming the marriage was irretrievably broken. Wife denied that the marriage was irretrievably broken.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Under Missouri law one of five factors must be proven when one of the parties to the marriage alleges that the marriage is not irretrievably broken.
Issue. Did husband present sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the marriage was irretrievably broken?
Held. The record did not provide substantial evidence that the marriage of the parties was irretrievably open.
Under Missouri Law, when one party denies that the marriage is irretrievably broken, the court must be satisfied that the petitioner has established one of the following five facts: 1) respondent committed adultery and petitioner finds it intolerable to live with respondent; 2) respondent behaved in such a way that petitioner cannot be reasonably expected to live with respondent; 3) respondent has abandoned petitioner for a period of at least six months; 4) parties have lived separate and apart for a continuous period of twelve months immediately preceding filing of the petition; 5) the parties have lived separate and apart for a continuous period of at least twenty-four months preceding the filing of the petition.
The transcript failed to demonstrate that any of these five facts had been established. Although the marriage may be well beyond saving, the Court must construe the law, not make it.
This marriage may well be beyond saving, and in holding as we do that there is not sufficient evidence in this record to support the finding of the trial court that this marriage is irretrievably broken within the terms of § 452.320.2(1) we are but delaying the inevitable; nevertheless, we as an appellate court, construe and apply the law, we do not make it.View Full Point of Law