Brief Fact Summary. The defendant, Christian Porter’s (the “defendant”), home was destroyed by a fire on July 20, 1992. The defendant was subsequently charged with and convicted of two counts of arson.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Scientific evidence must be reliable and relevant before it will be admissible.
Accordingly, we conclude that the Daubert approach should govern the admissibility of scientific evidence in Connecticut.View Full Point of Law
Issue. Whether Connecticut should adopt the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence?
Whether Connecticut should abandon its traditional per se rule that polygraph evidence is not admissible at trial?
Held. Justice Borden issued the opinion of the Supreme Court of Connecticut which did adopt the Daubert standard.
The per se rule against admitting polygraph evidence is affirmed because any evidentiary value of a polygraph is outweighed by its prejudicial effects.
Discussion. The Court extensively examined the elements of a polygraph examination and noted that the accuracy of the test is open to debate. Further, the value of the test as indicative of guilt or innocent is questionable. The test is too unreliable. Thus, even if the polygraph satisfies the Daubert standard for admission, the trial judge should continue to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by its prejudicial effect.