To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Hart v. Geysel

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Evidence keyed to Mueller

Citation. Hart v. Geysel, 159 Wash. 632, 294 P. 570, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 758 (Wash. 1930)

Brief Fact Summary. Defendant was involved in an illegal prizefight with Cartwright, the administrator of whose estate was Plaintiff. Cartwright died as a result of injuries he sustained in the fight. There was no willful or malicious intent shown on the part of Defendant, and both participants were willingly involved in the prizefight.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. Consent to invasion of a particular right prevents an action based upon such an invasion and one should not profit from his own misdeeds.

Facts. Plaintiff brought an action to recover for decedent Cartwright’s death at the hands of Defendant in an illegal prizefight. There is no evidence that Defendant intended to kill or severely injure Cartwright and both entered the fight willingly. The action was dismissed on the pleadings, and Plaintiff appealed.

Issue. Should the action have been dismissed because both parties to the prizefight entered into it willingly?
See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following