In Re Himmel

Ethics Keyed to Hazard

• Relationship of Law, Lawyers and Ethics
  • Spaulding v. Zimmerman
    
  • Commonwealth v. Stenhach
    517 Pa. 589; 534 A.2d 769;1987 Pa.
• Conformity to the Law
  • United States v. Gallene
    182 F.3d 578,1999 U.S. App.52 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 741
• Corporate Fraud and Lawyer Action
  • In re American Continental Corporation/Lincoln Sav. And Loan Securities Litigation
    794 F. Supp. 1424,1992 U.S. Dist.Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) P97,005
  • F.D.I.C. v. O
    969 F.2d 744,1992 U.S. App.
  • SEC v. National Student Marketing
    457 F. Supp. 682,1978 U.S. Dist.
  • Klein v. Boyd
    
  • In re Enron [Part One: The Allegations]
    235 F. Supp. 2d 549,2002 U.S. Dist.
  • In re Enron [Part Two: Primary Liability]
    235 F. Supp. 2d 549,2002 U.S. Dist.
  • In re Enron [Part Three: Why V+E is Subject to Suit But Not Kirkland]
    235 F. Supp. 2d 549,2002 U.S. Dist.
• Confidentiality
  • Upjohn v. United States
    449 U.S. 383,101 S. Ct. 677,66 L. Ed. 2d 584,1981 U.S.
  • Fisher v. United States
    131 S. Ct. 103; 178 L. Ed. 2d 30;2010 U.S.79 U.S.L.W. 3196
  • In Re Sealed Case (Lewinsky)
    162 F.3d 670, 333 U.S. App. D.C. 245; 1998 U.S. App.
  • In Re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation
    
  • Meyerhofer v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co
    497 F.2d 1190,1974 U.S. App.
  • Balla v. Gambro, Inc
    145 Ill. 2d 492,584 N.E.2d 104,1991 Ill.164 Ill. Dec. 892
• Conflicts of Interest
  • Westinghouse Elec. Corp v. Kerr-McGee Corp
    580 F.2d 1311,1978 U.S. App.1978-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P62,169
  • Fiandaca v. Cunningham
    827 F.2d 825,1987 U.S. App.8 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 858
  • Cuyler v. Sullivan
    466 U.S. 920; 104 S. Ct. 1700;80 L. Ed. 2d 173; 1984 U.S.
  • State v. Callahan
    552 U.S. 1070, 128 S. Ct. 726, 169 L. Ed. 2d 568 (2007) [2007 BL 163995]
  • Brennan
    590 F.2d 168 (5th. Cir., 1979)
  • Nemours Foundation v. Gilbane
    632 F. Supp. 418,1986 U.S. Dist.
  • Securities Investor Protection Corp. (SIPC) v. Vigman
    587 F. Supp. 1358 (C.D. Cal. 1984)
• Who is the Client?
  • Meehan v. Hopps
    45 Cal. 2d 213,288 P.2d 267,1955 Cal.
  • Yablonski v. United Mine Workers of America
    412 U.S. 918, 93 S. Ct. 2729, 37 L. Ed. 2d 144, 83 LRRM 2276 (1973)
  • Fassihi v. Sommers, Schwartz, Silver, Schwartz and Tyler, P.C
    107 Mich. App. 509,309 N.W.2d 645,1981 Mich. App.
  • Fickett v. Superior Court of Pima County
    558 P.2d 988, 1976 Ariz. App. 27 Ariz. App. 793
  • Paradigm Insurance Company v. The Langerman Law Offices
    200 Ariz. 146,24 P.3d 593,2001 Ariz.349 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 11
• Litigation and Negotiation
  • Nix v. Whiteside
    475 U.S. 157,106 S. Ct. 988,89 L. Ed. 2d 123,1986 U.S.
  • Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    436 Mass. 347,764 N.E.2d 825,2002 Mass.
• Lawyer
  • In the Matter of Fordham
    423 Mass. 481, 668 N.E.2d 816, 1996 Mass.
  • Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison v. Telex Corp
    602 F.2d 866,1979 U.S. App.1979-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P62,750
  • Bushman v. State Bar of California
    11 Cal. 3d 558,522 P.2d 312,113 Cal. Rptr. 904,1974 Cal.
  • White v. McBride
    937 S.W.2d 796,1996 Tenn.
  • Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of Iowa State Bar Association v. Mershon
    316 N.W.2d 895,1982 Iowa Sup.
  • Jones v. Barnes
    463 U.S. 745,103 S. Ct. 3308,77 L. Ed. 2d 987,1983 U.S.
• Competence
  • Lucas v. Hamm
    
  • Strickland v. Washington
    467 U.S. 1267; 104 S. Ct. 3562;82 L. Ed. 2d 864; 1984 U.S.
• Law, Lawyers and Justice
  • Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. Parsons Technology, Inc
    179 F.3d 956; 1999 U.S. App.
  • Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Ass
    486 U.S. 466, 108 S.Ct. 1916, 100 L.Ed.2d 475 (1988)
• The structure of Legal Practice
  • Hishon v. King & Spaulding
    467 U.S. 69,104 S. Ct. 2229,81 L. Ed. 2d 59,1984 U.S.
  • Murphy & Demory, Ltd. v. Murphy
    
  • In Re Masters
    208 Fed. Appx. 857 (Fed. Cir. 2006)
  • In Re Himmel
    131 Ill. 2d 239, 137 Ill. Dec. 62, 545 N.E.2d 715 (1989)