Citation. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of Supreme Court v. Employers Unity, Inc., 716 P.2d 460, 1986 Colo. LEXIS 529 (Colo. Mar. 31, 1986)
Brief Fact Summary. Defendants’ software product, designed to assist users in filling out basic legal forms, is challenged as an unauthorized practice of law in Texas. Facts.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Software products that actively assist users in filling out simple legal forms may constitute an unauthorized practice of law.
Plaintiffs, the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee (a Texas committee formed to enforce that state’s unauthorized practice of law rules), allege that Defendant software manufacturer’s product constitutes an unauthorized practice of law under Texas law. This software, “Quicken Family Lawyer,” “interviews” users to determine which of about 100 included legal forms would be right for them for a variety of simple legal tasks such as testamentary and divorce documents. It then assists the user in filling out the appropriate forms, even going as far as to tailor the form to the law of the user’s jurisdiction. Issue.
Can the development and sale of interactive software designed to help people with generalized legal problems constitute “the unauthorized practice of law”?