Add to Library

Search

J.E.B. v. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B

Citation. J.E.B. v. Ala. ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127, 114 S. Ct. 1419, 128 L. Ed. 2d 89, 62 U.S.L.W. 4219, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42,967, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2680, 94 Daily Journal DAR 5174, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 42 (U.S. Apr. 19, 1994)

Powered by

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

CitationJ.E.B. v. Ala. ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127, 114 S. Ct. 1419, 128 L. Ed. 2d 89, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3121, 62 U.S.L.W. 4219, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42,967, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2680, 94 Daily Journal DAR 5174, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 42 (U.S. Apr. 19, 1994)

J.E.B. v. Ala. ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127, 114 S. Ct. 1419, 128 L. Ed. 2d 89, 1994 U.S. LEXIS 3121, 62 U.S.L.W. 4219, 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P42,967, 94 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2680, 94 Daily Journal DAR 5174, 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 42 (U.S. Apr. 19, 1994)

Brief Fact Summary. The State of Alabama used preemptory challenges in such a way as to create an all female jury in a paternity case.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. “Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors violates the Equal Protection Clause, particularly where.

Create New Group