To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




United States v. Jewell

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Criminal Law Keyed to LaFave

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 130 S. Ct. 3297; 176 L. Ed. 2d 1188;2010 U.S.78 U.S.L.W. 3667

Brief Fact Summary. Appellant contends that he did not have the requisite mental state when he drove a car into the United States that contained concealed drugs. Appellant argued that he had no actual knowledge of the drugs.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. Willful blindness is equivalent to knowledge.

Facts. Appellant entered the United States driving a car with 110 pounds of Marijuana concealed in a hidden compartment. Appellant alleged that he did not know that the car contained drugs and remained ignorant. The State alleged that to convict, the jury must find that Appellant ”˜knowingly’ brought the marijuana into the United States and that he ”˜knowingly’ possessed the marijuana.

Issue. Whether willful ignorance constituted knowingly under the statute in question.

See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following