View this case and other resources at:
Brief Fact Summary. Defendant was convicted of attempting to obtain money by false pretenses.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Acts remotely leading to the commission of the crime are not to be considered as attempts, but acts immediately connected with the crime are attempts.
Issue. Whether the credit attributed to Defendant’s account can be considered an attempt to obtain money under the false pretenses law.
Held. Affirmed, the act of receiving credit for distribution of the loaves of bread was the last act necessary on behalf of Defendant and makes him guilty of an attempt to obtain money by false pretenses.
Acts remotely leading towards the commission of the offense are not to be considered as attempts to commit it, but acts immediately connected with it are.
After Defendant obtained the credit from the Parrish, he was not required to do any further acts to obtain payment and therefore constituted an attempt
Discussion. This analysis was called the “last act” test. It did not last long in the courts. However as applied here, the court ruled that Defendant was not obligated to do anything further to receive the money under the contract. It was only the discovery by the Parrish of the fraud that led to Defendant never receiving payment.