To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




In re Tyvonne

Citation. In re Tyvonne, 558 A.2d 661 (Conn. 1989)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Tyvonne tried to implement the assault defense in juvenile court after he shot another elementary school student.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

The defense of infancy can only be used in criminal proceedings where a juvenile is being tried as an adult.


Tyvonne was eight-years-old when he brought a pistol to school. When students teased Tyvonne claiming that the pistol was fake, Tyvonne proved that the pistol was real by shooting another person. Tyvonne was convicted for assault in the juvenile court for second-degree assault. Tyvonne appealed his conviction claiming that he should be able to use the infancy defense in juvenile court.


Whether the infancy defense can be used in a juvenile case?


No. The infancy defense is not available to juveniles. The decision of the lower courts are affirmed.


Infancy is a common law defense and the defense of infancy does not apply to juvenile proceedings because juvenile proceedings are created by statute. Juvenile proceedings are not governed by common law and a juvenile defendant cannot be relieved of responsibility for their actions through the use of common law defenses. If Tyvonne were permitted to use the infancy defense, Tyvonne would not be held liable for his actions and would not be subject to rehabilitation.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following