Brief Fact Summary. Seaman Lane, who was enlisted in the Coast Guard of Defendant, The United States, was responsible for damage to a drydock owned by Plaintiff, Ira S. Bushey & Sons. Plaintiff sought relief from Defendant for Lane’s actions.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. An employer will be held liable under respondeat superior if the actions of the employee arise out of the course of his employment.
When considering which risks the employer must bear under vicarious liability, the proper test bears more resemblance to that which limits liability for workers compensation than to the test for negligence, because the employer should be held to anticipate and allow for risks to the public that arise out of and in the course of his employment of labor.View Full Point of Law
Issue. The issue is whether Defendant can be held responsible for actions of their employee when the actions are outside of the scope of their duties.
Held. Defendant is liable for the actions of Lane. Although Lane’s actions were not within the duties of his employment, Defendant should be liable for any damages done by an employee during the course of his employment.
Discussion. The level of foreseeability in a respondeat superior issue is not the same as foreseeability in a negligence case. For purposes of respondeat superior, it is only required that an employer would perceive that harm could flow from actions of their employees, whether or not employer takes all precautions.