Brief Fact Summary. Clark (Plaintiff) bought a car from Boise Dodge, Inc (Defendant). Defendant claimed that the car was “new” but, in fact, the car was a “demonstration” model and the odometer had been turned back from 6,968 miles. At trial, the jury awarded Plaintiff $350.00 in actual damages and $12, 500.00 in punitative damages
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Punitive damages are proper in cases of calculated deceit in contract cases.
Issue. Was the jury correct in awarding $12, 500.00 in punitive damages?
A cold and calculating deceiver would not be deterred if punitive damages were not available. Such a deceiver would only have to fear paying the actual damages and the, only if one of their victims took the time and effort to sue them.
Whether or not there should be punitive damages and how much, has always been at the discretion of the jury. The value of the punitive effect of such damages varies from case to case.
In this case, Defendant acted in a calculated and deceitful way, harming, not only Plaintiff, but the public at large.
Discussion. This is a case where, in order to find complete justice, the law allows for element of tort law to enter the realm of contract law. This is due to the fact that Defendant was deceitful, Plaintiff was at the mercy of Defendant in regards to information about t