Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Crabtree alleges that Defendant Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp. breached a two year employment contract.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. More than one document may be linked together either expressly or impliedly by the subject matter and occasion to supply a memo to satisfy the statute of frauds.
Issue. Was the lower court justified in finding that the contract satisfied the statute of frauds?
Held. Yes. The lower court was justified in finding that the contract satisfied the statute of frauds
Because the contract cannot be performed in under a year, it falls under the statute of frauds. If a contract falls under the statute of frauds it must have a sufficient memo that is signed with the intent to authenticate the terms and evidences the terms of the contract. The memo does not have to be one document. It may be multiple documents if they are linked together expressly or internally by evidence of subject matter and occasion.
The Court finds in this case that the memo written on the telephone order, the payroll change form initialed by Defendant’s general manager, and the paper signed by Defendant’s comptroller all refer to the same transaction on their face. The Court holds that the lower court was justified in finding that the three documents comprised a sufficient memo.
It is enough, to meet the statute's demands, that it was signed with intent to authenticate the information contained therein and that such information does evidence the terms of the contract.View Full Point of Law