To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Constitutional Law Keyed to Sullivan

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 359 U.S. 532; 79 S. Ct. 1136;3 L. Ed. 2d 1028; 1959 U.S.

Brief Fact Summary. The 1912 Arizona Train Limit Law, which prohibited the operation of railroad trains longer than fourteen passenger or seventy freight cars, was found invalid by the Supreme Court of the United States because it violated the commerce clause. The law impeded the free flow of commerce by only allowing shorter trains within its borders.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. If a state law’s burden of commerce outweighs the regulatory advantage to the state, the law violates the commerce clause, and is therefore invalid. A state may not regulate phases of national commerce (e.g. interstate train travel) that need national uniformity.

Facts. The Arizona Train Limit Law of 1912 prohibited railroad trains of more than fourteen passenger or seventy freight cars. In 1940, Plaintiff, State of Arizona, sued Defendant, Southern Pacific Company, for violating that law. The trial court found in favor of Defendant, holding that the law violated the commerce clause. The Supreme Court of Arizona reversed, finding that a state law enacted under the police power with reasonable relation to health and safety could not be overturned despite its adverse affect on interstate commerce.

Issue. Whether the health and safety effects of Arizona’s 1912 law outweighed the national interest in keeping interstate commerce free from interferences.
See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following