To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Steffan v. Cheney

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Civil Procedure Keyed to Yeazell

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 920 F.2d 74, 287 U.S. App. D.C. 143; 1990 U.S. App. 21001, 18 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 498

Brief Fact Summary. The Plaintiff, Joseph C. Steffan (Plaintiff), brought suit against the United States Naval Academy after he resigned following an administrative hearing calling for his dismissal. Plaintiff’s suit was dismissed by the district court for failing to comply with court’s discovery order.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Court imposed sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 37 may not be upheld if there imposition is based upon an error of law.

Facts. Plaintiff resigned from the Naval Academy in 1987 after an administrative board recommended he be discharged. The board’s recommendation was based solely upon Plaintiff’s statements declaring himself a homosexual. In 1988 Plaintiff filed this action, claiming he was constructively discharged and challenged the constitutionality of the regulations providing for the discharge of admitted homosexuals. The district court dismissed Plaintiff’s case because, claiming his Fifth Amendment constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, he refused to answer questions regarding whether he had engaged in homosexual conduct during or after his tenure as a midshipman. He also objected on grounds that the questions were not relevant to the legality of this separation. Thus, the district court dismissed Plaintiff’s action for failure to comply with its discovery under FRCP Rule 37(b)(2).

Issue. When may a court dismiss a complaint for a plaintiff’s refusal to comply with a discovery order under FRCP Rule 37.

See More Course Videos

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following