Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

D’Onofrio v. SFX Sports Group, Inc.

Citation. 247 F.R.D. 43 (D.D.C. 2008)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

D’Onofrio moved to compel SFX Sports Group, Inc. to produce a business plan in its original format with metadata after failing to do so initially.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A party is not required to provide electronically stored information in the original format with stored metadata when responding to a discovery request.

Facts.

D’Onofrio sued her employer, SFX Sports Group, Inc. (SFX) claiming gender discrimination and wrongful termination. D’Onofrio asked SFX to produce their business plan but they did not provide their business plan in its original format. D’Onofrio then moved to compel SFX Sports Group, Inc. to produce a business plan in its original format with metadata.

Issue.

Whether a party must provide electronically stored information in the original format with stored metadata when responding to a discovery request?

Held.

No. An order to compel is inappropriate because D’Onofrio did not initially request for SFX to provide the business plan in its original format with the metadata.

Discussion.

FRCP 34(b)(1)(C) allows a party to request electronic information to be produced in a specific form. However, D’Onofrio misinterpreted FRCP 34(b)(1)(C) to mean that the requested documents could only be produced in its original form.


Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following