Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register
Register

Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc

Law Dictionary
CASE BRIEFS

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
AA
Font size

Administrative Law Keyed to Lawson

Held. Yes. Reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals. The EPA’s definition of the term “source” is a permissible construction of the statute which seeks to accommodate progress in reducing air pollution with economic growth. A review of the EPA’s varying interpretations of “source” over time demonstrated that it consistently viewed the term flexibly, in the context of implementing policy decisions in a technical and complex arena. It was not the agency, but the Court of Appeals, that read the statute inflexibly in 1980 to command a plant-wide definition for plants designed to maintain clean air, and a to forbid such a definition for programs designed to improve air quality. It was a basic legal error for the Court of Appeals to adopt a static definition of the term “stationary source” when it had decided that Congress itself had not commanded that definition. Dissent. None. Concurrence. None.

Discussion. Chevron was a landmark case that advocated giving agencies deference for their reasonable policy-making decisions.

Black Letter Law: to view the black letter law, scroll down to the LexisNexis Headnotes of this case.   What’s a headnote?


Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following