To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Tashire

Citation. 386 U.S. 523, 87 S.Ct. 119, 18 L.Ed.2d 270 (1967)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Petitioner brought an interpleader action, requesting that all lawsuits involving their insurance coverage of the truck driver be consolidated into one proceeding.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1335, an insurance company does not have to wait for claimants to obtain a judgment against the insured before interpleading the group.


Four bus passengers (Respondents) injured when a bus collided with a truck sued Greyhound Lines Inc., the bus driver, the truck driver, and the truck owner, in California state court. Before this lawsuit went to trial, State Farm Fire & Causality Co. (Petitioner) brought an interpleader action in federal court requesting that all actions brought against it through the insurance policy Plaintiff had with the truck driver be consolidated into this one proceeding.


Is an insurance company required to wait until all persons asserting claims have reduced judgments before bringing an interpleader action?


No, the insurance company is not required to wait. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case remanded.


First, the Court ruled that 28 U.S.C. § 1335 required only minimal diversity of citizenship and thus was proper in federal Court. The Court determined that under the language of 28 U.S.C. § 1335, the Petitioner did not have to wait for the claims to be reduced to a judgment before bringing an interpleader. However, the Court further determined that the lower court exceeded its authority in extending the injunction to Greyhound Lines Inc., the bus driver, and the truck driver because they were not related to the claims against the insurance fund.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following