Plaintiff suffered injuries after a truck he was driving, which was carrying concrete, rolled over. He brought an action against the manufacturer and seller of the truck, asserting six causes of action. One defendant moved to dismiss, to strike certain allegations, and for a more definite statement.
Plaintiff suffered injuries after a truck he was driving, which was carrying concrete, rolled over. He brought an action against the manufacturer and seller of the truck asserting six causes of action: negligence, breach of warranty of fitness, strict liability, breach of warranty of merchantability, loss of consortium, punitive damages. One defendant moved to dismiss, to strike certain allegations, and for a more definite statement.
Should Defendant’s motion for dismissal of the complaint, to strike certain allegations in the complaint, or for a more definite statement be granted?
Rule 12(b)(6): This motion was denied, in part, and granted, in part.
Rule 12(f): The motion was denied.
Rule 12(e): The motion was denied.
Rule 12(b)(6): Plaintiffs negligence allegations were sufficient to defeat the motion to dismiss; the punitive damages claim was dismissed, and although Plaintiffs failed to state a breach of warranty claim, the court allowed Plaintiff leave to amend.
Rule 12(f): The motion was denied with respect to Plaintiffs’ damages request and any fleeting allegations of illegality.
Rule 12(e): The motion for a more definite statement was denied; Plaintiffs sufficiently provided a short and plain statement of their claim.