Register | Lost your password?

CaseBriefs

Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 411 U.S. 582, 93 S. Ct. 1736, 36 L. Ed. 2d 503 (1973)

Brief Fact Summary. Respondent, Occidental Petroleum Corp., purchased over ten percent of a company in an attempt to acquire the company. After failing to acquire it, Respondent made a deal with the newly acquired company, Petitioner Kern County Land Co., to sell back the shares after six months.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. A purchase and sale of shares will not be considered a “sale” under Section: 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act if there was no indication that there was an abuse of insider information.


Facts. Respondent made a tender offer to purchase shares of the company that preceded Petitioner company. Respondent ended up with over 10% of the stock. The preceding company, in a defensive strategy to avoid Respondent’s takeover, sought another company to overbid Respondent. Another company, Tenneco, stepped forward, outbid Respondent and made Petitioner company out of the former company. The shareholders received a share-for-share swap of the old company for Tenneco stock. To the dissatisfaction of both parties, the transaction made Respondent a minority shareholder in a competitor’s stock. Respondent then agreed to a binding option sell back the Tenneco shares to Tenneco after six months, and the deal netted Respondent $19 million. Petitioner brought this action to recover the profit under Section: 16(b) which allows a company to capture from beneficial shareholders (shareholders owning over 10% of the total shares) any profits from a sale that occurs within six months of the pu
rchase of the shares.

Issue. The issue is whether Respondent’s binding option to sell back shares after a failed takeover bid after the statutory six months is a “sale” for purposes of Section: 16(b).

Content Type: Brief


Comments are closed.