To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library





The testimony of the defendants indicated that the * * * oil refinery is a modern plant of the type in approved, known, and general use for renovating used lubricating oils; that the oil refinery is not so constructed or operated as to give out noxious gases or odors in annoying quantities; and that the oil refinery has not annoyed the plaintiffs or any other persons save on a single occasion when it suffered a brief mechanical breakdown.
* * *

[After a trial before a jury, judgment was entered for the plaintiffs for money damages due to the defendants’ creation of a private nuisance.] * * * Ervin,J, on appeal

Each defendant assigns as error the disallowance of its motion for a compulsory nonsuit. We consider these assignments of error separately because the defendants urge different reasons to sustain their respective positions.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following