To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Hartman v. Hartle

Citation. Hartman v. Hartle, 95 N.J. Eq. 123, 122 A. 615, 10 B Stockton 123 (Ch. Nov. 17, 1923)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Dorothea Glick created a will leaving her property to her five children. The complainant, one of her children, sued the trustee and the executor for selling the property to the executor’s wife and keeping the profits off of the subsequent. sale of the property to an innocent purchaser.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A trustee nor his wife may purchase property from himself at his own sale unless leave to do so has been previously obtained under an order of the court.


Glick created a will that expressly directed her executors to sell her real estate and divide the proceeds equally among her children. The executors sold part of the real estate at public auction for $3,900 to one of the testator’s sons, Lewis Geick. Geick bought the property for his sister Josephine Dieker, the wife of one of the executors. Dieker sold the property to the defendant for $5,500. The complainant alleged that the sale was improper because the executors needed permission from the court to sale the property to the executor’s wife, Geick.


Whether a trustee may sell property to his wife without permission by an order of the court?


No. A trustee’s wife may not sell property from himself at his own sale. Nonetheless, a resale may not be ordered because the property is currently owned by innocent purchasers. Instead, the executors hold an account for the complainant’s one-fifth share of the profits made on the resale of the property.


Because the executor sold the property to his wife, the beneficiaries did not receive a fair amount of the testator’s estate.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following