To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Irwin Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Long

Citation. Irwin Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Long, 160 Ind. App. 509, 312 N.E.2d 908
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here

Brief Fact Summary.

Laura Long created a trust for her son, the appellate, Phillip W. Long that gave him the right to withdraw from the principal once in any year of up to four percent (4%) upon request to the trustee. The appellant, Victoria Long, sought to attach his interest in the trust to satisfy his obligation under a divorce decree.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A creditor may acquire a power, compel its exercise, nor reach property covered by a power if the donee of the general power of appointment fails to exercise that power.


The appellee was the beneficiary of a trust that gave him the right to withdraw principal once in any calendar year upon thirty days written notice to the trustee up to four percent (4%) of the market value of the entire trust principal on the date of such notice. The appellant sought to attach the interest in the trust to satisfy the appellee’s obligations under a divorce decree.


Whether a creditor can reach the assets subject to a general power of appointment, if that power has not yet been exercised?


No. The bank may not reach the appellee’s interest in the trust because his interest is a power that he has not yet exercised. No title vests in the appellee until he exercises that power. Until then, the power is just an offer that a court of law cannot compel him to accept.


The appellee here was the beneficiary under a trust who could only receive from the trust if he made a request for a disbursement. He did not have any other control over the assets of the trust. Until he made a request for a disbursement, he had no title to the assets of the trust.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following