Brief Fact Summary. Appellants claim that Respondent is not the surviving spouse but rather the ex-wife of the decedent. Therefore it was error of the court to appoint the Respondent as the personal representative of the decedent’s estate.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. When no divorce decree or order is on record a party will not be estopped from claiming that she is not divorced from the decedent. A divorce decree cannot be based on an oral agreement between parties but rather must be an order of the court.
Do the Appellants lack standing to appeal?
Did the trial court err in concluding that Respondent was the surviving spouse for purposes of intestate succession?
Did the trial court err in appointing Respondent as personal representative of decedent’s estate?
Did the trial court err in denying the Appellant’s motion to compel settlement of the case?
Is Respondent entitled to attorney fees and costs related to the appeal?
No. Appellant Wanda, as creditor of the decedent, is an aggrieved party as to trial court’s decision on the appointment of Respondent as personal representative. In addition none of the Appellants have standing to contest the enforcement of the distribution or oral settlement agreements.
No. The record shows that no divorce decree was every issued and therefore the trial court did not err in holding that Respondent was the surviving spouse of the decedent.
No. As the surviving spouse of the decedent, Respondent has priority for appointment as personal representative and her appointment was agreed to by the children through their guardian ad litem.
No. Since the settlement agreement in this case was oral and not on file with the court or in the minutes the trial court did not err in denying the Appellant’s motion to compel settlement.
No. Respondent is not entitled to attorney fees and cost as the record demonstrates that the issues raised by the Appellants were based on reasonable grounds.
We review a district court's appointment of a personal representative to determine whether the court correctly interpreted the law.View Full Point of Law