Login

Login

To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library

Add

Search

Login
Register

MISCELLANEOUS TORTS

Chapter 18

MISCELLANEOUS TORTS

This chapter covers several torts that have little to do with each other:

  • Invasion of privacy:  The tort of “invasion of privacy” is actually a cluster of four different, but related, torts.
    • Misappropriation of identity:  “Misappropriation of identity” occurs where P’s name or likeness has been used by D for D’s financial benefit, without P’s consent.
    • Intrusion on solitude:  “Intrusion on solitude” occurs where D invades P’s private space in a manner which would be highly offensive to a reasonable person in P’s position.
    • Publicity of private life:  “Publicity of private life” or “public disclosure” occurs where D publicly discloses a non-public detail of P’s private life, where the effect would be highly offensive to a reasonable person in P’s position.
    • False light:  “False light” occurs where D publishes false statements about P which, although not defamatory, would be highly offensive to a reasonable person in P’s position.
  • Misuse of legal procedure:  Three related tort actions protect P’s interest in not being subjected to unwarranted judicial proceedings:
    • Malicious prosecution:  The tort of “malicious prosecution” protects P’s interest in not having wrongfully instigated a criminal proceeding against him.
    • Wrongful institution of civil proceedings:  The tort of “wrongful institution of civil proceedings” is similar to “malicious prosecution,” except that the original proceedings are civil rather than criminal.
    • Abuse of process:  “Abuse of process” occurs where a person involved in criminal or civil proceedings uses various litigation devices (e.g., subpoenas) for improper purposes.
  • “Business torts”:  There are three related torts that protect business interests:
    • Injurious falsehood:  The action for “injurious falsehood” protects P against certain false statements made against his business, product or property (e.g., D makes false statements disparaging P’s goods or business).
    • Interference with contract:  The tort of “interference with contract” protects P’s interest in having others perform existing contracts which they have with her. The claim is against one who induces another to breach a contract with P.
    • Interference with prospective advantage:  If due to D’s interference, P loses the benefits of prospective, potential contracts (as opposed to existing contracts), P can sue for “interference with prospective advantage.”

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following