Brief Fact Summary. Store security officers believed Peters shoplifted a power drill. Upon questioning him in the parking lot, he fled on foot, and they pursued him off store premises for seven minutes. Peters ran into the river and drowned. His estate sued the store in wrongful death and lost.
Â
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Â Merchants generally have the right to detain suspected shoplifters assuming the detention is (1) with reasonable cause to believe a violation has occurred; (2) in a reasonable manner, and (3) for a reasonable length of time.
Â
A person is not using ordinary care and is negligent, if the person, without intending to do harm, does something (or fails to do something) that a reasonable person would recognize as creating an unreasonable risk of injury or damage to a person or property.
View Full Point of LawÂ
Issue. Whether a merchant or its agents are immune from liability under Wisconsin law for actions taken in pursuit of a suspected shoplifter that occur off of the merchant’s premises.
Â
Held. Yes, so long as three reasonableness requirements are met. Wisconsin statute § 943.50(3) permits merchants to detain suspected shoplifters (1) with reasonable cause to believe a violation has occurred; (2) in a reasonable manner, and (3) for a reasonable length of time. To interpret whether this statute also limits liability for actions taken off-premises, the court examined the statute’s construction. The court found that the legislature specifically excluded from the statute language from the Restatement of Torts § 120A that extends immunity only to those detentions occurring “on the premises.â€Â That the Wisconsin statute contains no such phrase plainly suggests that the legislature intended to allow merchants to follow suspects off the store’s premises to detain them. Public policy supports this construction, because to limit merchants from off-premises pursuits would increase shoplifting and result in stores having to charge higher prices to make up for losses. Furthermore, shoplifters would be encouraged to dash out of stores off-premises, increasing injuries to innocent shoppers in the way.
Â
Discussion. This decision introduces the concept of the common law “shopkeepers privilege†which allows merchants to effect reasonable detentions of suspected shoplifters. The shopkeeper’s privilege can also be used as a defense against a false imprisonment claim made against a store by a detained suspected shoplifter.