Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

Citation. 445 F. Supp. 168 (D.D.C. 1978)

Powered by

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

Citation445 F. Supp. 168 (D.D.C. 1978)

Brief Fact Summary.

Nader filed a suit for fraudulent misrepresentation after being removed from his flight with Allegheny Airlines, Inc. in accordance with the airline’s overbooking policy.

Synopsis of Rule of Law.

A statement in a business transaction constitutes fraudulent misrepresentation if the information is materially misleading due to the lack of a qualifier.

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

A defendant need act only with such conscious and deliberate disregard of the consequences of his actions to others that his conduct is wanton.

View Full Point of Law

Nader bought a ticket with Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (Allegheny) and received a flight confirmation. Nader filed a suit for fraudulent misrepresentation after being removed from his flight with Allegheny Airlines, Inc. in accordance with the airline’s overbooking policy.

Issue.

Whether a statement in a business transaction constitutes fraudulent misrepresentation if the information is materially misleading due to the lack of a qualifier.

Held.

Yes. Alleghany is liable to Nader for fraudulent misrepresentation. Without information indicating that a passenger is subject to removal due to an overbooking policy, a passenger has reason to believe that a ticket confirmation will ensure their seat on a flight.

Discussion.

A statement in a business transaction constitutes fraudulent misrepresentation if the information is materially misleading due to the lack of a qualifier. A defendant is guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation if the plaintiff can prove that the defendant made a false representation regarding a material fact, the defendant knew that the statement was false, made the statement in order to deceive the plaintiff, and the plaintiff relied on the false representation.