Brief Fact Summary. A provision in a lease gave a lessee the option to purchase commercial property at any time in the duration of the lease. The lessor refused to sell the property after the lessee gave notice of his intent to exercise his option and claimed that it violated the rule against perpetuities.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. An option to purchase contained in a commercial lease, if the option to must be exercised within the leasehold term, is valid without regard to the rule against perpetuities.
The unreasonableness of the result obtained by the acceptance of one possible alternative interpretation of an act is a reason for rejecting that interpretation in favor of another which would provide a result that is reasonable.View Full Point of Law
Issue. Is an option to purchase in a commercial lease, when the option must be exercised within the leasehold term, valid without regard to the rule against perpetuities?
The rule against perpetuities states that no interest is good unless it must vest, if at all, no later than twenty-one years after some life in being at the creation of the interest. Historically, the rule does not apply to an option to renew the term if a real property lease.
An option in a long-term commercial lease encourages the public policy of free alienability of property because it improves the property, which increases marketability.
So, an option to purchase contained in a commercial lease, if the option must be exercised within the leasehold term, is valid without regard to the rule against perpetuities.
Discussion. Though an option to purchase may limit the lessor’s ability to transfer the property in the future, it will encourage the lessee to agree to the leasehold, which makes the property more marketable.