Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff, Elmer Curtis Turbyfill, suffered severe burns after he caught fire while starting a vehicle owned by Defendant, International Harvester. Plaintiff appealed the decision to allow a note written by a now-deceased witness, Oakley Anderson, to be admitted.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Hearsay evidence that does not fit under any particular exceptions to the hearsay rules can still be admissible under Rule 804(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Evidence if it meets the requirements therein.
Issue. The issue is whether the signed statement from the now-deceased witness is admissible under a hearsay exception.
Held. The United States District Court for the Eastern District Of Michigan, Southern Division, held that the written statement met all the requirements under Rule 804(b)(5) as being admissible. The Rule stipulates that the statement should be offered as evidence of a material fact, there is no other evidence more probative in proving the points at issue, and the general purposes of justice will be served through its admission. The facts demonstrate that the statement met these requirements. The Court notes that the reliability of the statement is proven by the fact that it was written outside of any pressure from supervisors, and the supervisor verified that it was from Anderson. The Court also noted that if Anderson were alive today, the evidence would have been admissible to refresh his memory.
The rules of practice and procedure include the rules of evidence.View Full Point of Law