To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Frye v. U.S

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Evidence keyed to Fisher

Citation. Frye v. United States, 2009 U.S. LEXIS 6377, 558 U.S. 916, 130 S. Ct. 307, 175 L. Ed. 2d 204, 78 U.S.L.W. 3179 (U.S. Oct. 5, 2009)

Brief Fact Summary. Mr. Frye (Appellant) was convicted of second-degree murder, after the lower court disallowed Appellant from introducing testimonial evidence relating to the results of a deception test Appellant had taken following the crime. Appellant appeals his conviction here.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. When a test (such as a systolic blood pressure deception test) has not gained scientific recognition from psychological and physiological authorities, expert testimony regarding the results of such a test is inadmissible.

Facts. Appellant was charged with and put on trial for murder. At his trial, Appellant attempted to call an expert witness to testify that Appellant had taken a systolic blood pressure deception test, and to further testify as to the results of the test. The expert testimony was held inadmissible by the lower court, Appellant was convicted of second-degree murder.

Issue. Was it error for the lower court to have excluded the expert testimony regarding the systolic blood pressure deception test at Appellant’s criminal trial?

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following