Add to Library

Search

Ballew v. Georgia

Citation. Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223, 98 S. Ct. 1029, 55 L. Ed. 2d 234, 3 Media L. Rep. 1979 (U.S. Mar. 21, 1978)

Powered by

Law Students: Don’t know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here

CitationBallew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223, 98 S. Ct. 1029, 55 L. Ed. 2d 234, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 68, 3 Media L. Rep. 1979 (U.S. Mar. 21, 1978)

Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223, 98 S. Ct. 1029, 55 L. Ed. 2d 234, 1978 U.S. LEXIS 68, 3 Media L. Rep. 1979 (U.S. Mar. 21, 1978)

Brief Fact Summary. Petitioner was convicted by a fiver person jury.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. “Because of the fundamental importance of the jury trial to the American system of criminal justice, any further reduction [of the number of members on a jury below six] that promotes inaccurate and possibly biased decisionmaking [sic], that causes untoward differences in verdicts, and that prevents juries from truly representing their communities, attains constitutional significance.”

Points of Law - Legal Principles in this Case for Law Students.

At some point, this decline leads to inaccurate factfinding and incorrect application of the common sense of the community to the facts.

View Full Point of Law

point of law

Facts. “Petitioner was convicted on two misdemeanor counts of distributing obscene material by a five-person jury impaneled according to Georgia law.”

Issue.
“Whether a further reduction in the size of the state criminal jury.

Create New Group