To access this feature, please Log In or Register for your Casebriefs Account.

Add to Library




Illinois v. Lidster

Law Dictionary

Law Dictionary

Featuring Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.
Font size

Criminal Procedure keyed to Saltzburg

View this case and other resources at:
Bloomberg Law

Citation. 540 U.S. 419, 124 S. Ct. 885, 157 L. Ed. 2d 843 (2004)

Brief Fact Summary. Police set up a highway checkpoint to ask motorists for information about a hit and run. Respondent was determined at the checkpoint to be driving under the influence.

Synopsis of Rule of Law. Where a stop advances a grave public concern to a significant degree, and interferes only minimally with liberty the Fourth Amendment seeks to protect.

Facts. In response to the hit-and-run death of a bicyclist, police set up a checkpoint to ask occupants if they had any information about the incident, and handed each driver a flyer about the matter. Respondent Robert Lidster’s vehicle swerved as it approached the checkpoint. A roadside sobriety test determined that the respondent was driving under the influence of alcohol.

Issue. Whether a “highway checkpoint where police stopped motorists to ask them for information” about a criminal matter complied with the Fourth Amendment.

Create New Group

Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following