Citation. 337 U.S. 241, 69 S. Ct. 1079, 93 L. Ed. 1337 (1949)
Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here
Brief Fact Summary.
Defendant appealed from a death sentence, when it was determined by evidence that had been considered of his criminal record, because he was not given the opportunity for cross-examination.
Synopsis of Rule of Law.
Whether a defendant’s rights to due process have been violated when his criminal record is used against him as a means of enhancing his sentence.
A jury in New York State court found appellant guilty of murder in the first degree, and recommended life imprisonment. The trial judge imposed a sentence of death after considering additional information of the defendant’s criminal record. Williams sought an appeal on the basis that he was not given the opportunity for cross-examination or rebuttal.
Whether use of a defendant’s criminal record in sentencing is tantamount to a violation of their right to due process.
Due process should not be considered a wall that is impenetrable by the evidentiary process that a judge must go through in determining sentencing. Affirmed.
Justice Murphy, for the dissent, argues that due process accords a defendant a fair trial at every stage and, by including evidence of a criminal record at sentencing, without affording the defendant a means of rebuttal, the defendant is necessarily being deprived of that right.
Due process is not a complete bar to the inclusion of evidence when it is to be considered by a Judge at the sentencing stage.