Preface |
|||
Acknowledgments |
|||
Chapter 1 The Sources and Limitations of the Criminal Law |
|||
Overview |
|||
Sources of Criminal Law |
|||
The Common Law as a Source of Criminal Law |
|||
Legislative Sources |
|||
The Model Penal Code as a Source of Criminal Law |
|||
Constitutional Sources and Limits |
|||
Limitations on the Criminal Law |
|||
The Principle of Legality |
|||
The Common Law in England |
|||
The Common Law in the United States |
|||
The Strengths and Weaknesses of Common Law Crimes |
|||
Principle of Legality |
|||
Ex Post Facto |
|||
The Rule of Lenity |
|||
Void for Vagueness |
|||
The Burden of Proof |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 2 The Purposes of Punishment |
|||
Overview |
|||
Defining Punishment |
|||
The Purposes of Punishment |
|||
Utilitarianism |
|||
Deterrence |
|||
Incapacitation |
|||
Rehabilitation |
|||
Empirical Critiques |
|||
Normative Critiques |
|||
Retribution |
|||
The Relationship of the Theories |
|||
The Importance of Sentencing |
|||
“Civil” vs. “Punitive” |
|||
The Difference Between “Criminal” and “Civil” Confinement |
|||
A Contemporary Example: Sexual Predator Laws |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 3 Actus Reus |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Voluntary Act |
|||
Omission and Legal Duty |
|||
Moral Duty |
|||
Possession |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Voluntary Act |
|||
Omission and Legal Duty |
|||
A More Precise Definition for Actus Reus |
|||
Possession |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 4 The Doctrines of Mens Rea |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Concepts of Mens Rea |
|||
“Traditional” and “Statutory” Mens Rea |
|||
Motive and Mens Rea |
|||
Motive and Defenses |
|||
Specific Kinds of Mens Rea |
|||
Intent (Purpose) |
|||
Knowledge |
|||
Recklessness |
|||
Negligence as a Predicate for Criminal Liability |
|||
Proving Mens Rea |
|||
Contemporaneity, Prior Fault, and Time Frames |
|||
Statutory Interpretation and Mens Rea |
|||
Principles of Statutory Construction |
|||
Element Analysis |
|||
The “Default Position” |
|||
Mens Rea and the Constitution |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
“Elements” v. “Material” Elements |
|||
Kinds of Material Elements |
|||
Levels of Mental States |
|||
Element Analysis |
|||
The Default Position Under the Code |
|||
Summary |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 5 Mistake |
|||
Overview |
|||
Mistake and Ignorance of Law |
|||
Ignorance of the Law |
|||
Mistake of Law |
|||
Exceptions to the Rule |
|||
“Specific Intent” Crimes |
|||
Noncriminal Law Mistake |
|||
Estoppel |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Retention of the “Ignorantia Lex” Doctrine |
|||
The “Reasonable Reliance” Approach to Mistake |
|||
Mistake of Fact |
|||
Reasonableness and Specific Intent |
|||
Knowledge and Willful Blindness |
|||
Mistake of Legal Fact |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
A Note on the Future of Mistake |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 6 Strict Liability |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Reach of Strict Criminal Liability |
|||
Definitions and Indicia of Strict Liability |
|||
Public Welfare Offenses |
|||
Mala in Se (“Real”) vs. Mala Prohibita (“Unreal”?) Crimes |
|||
“Regulatory” or “Police” Offenses |
|||
Innocent Actors |
|||
The Litmus Test of Available Punishments |
|||
Strict vs. Vicarious Liability |
|||
Arguments For and Against Strict Liability |
|||
Alternatives to Strict Liability |
|||
“Greater Crime” Theory |
|||
One More Way of Imposing Strict Liability: Elements, Material Elements, and Sentencing Factors |
|||
Constitutionality |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
A Recap and a Methodology |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 7 Causation |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Rationale of Causation |
|||
The Elements of Causation |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Responsibility for Causing Harm |
|||
Cause in Fact |
|||
Omission as a Cause |
|||
Concurrent Causation |
|||
Direct Cause |
|||
Proximate Cause |
|||
Contributory Negligence and Proximate Causation |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Responsibility for Causing Harm |
|||
“But For” Causation |
|||
Other Causation, Concurrent Causation, and Transferred Intent |
|||
Culpability as to Result |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 8 Homicide |
|||
Overview |
|||
Human Being |
|||
When Does Life Begin? |
|||
When Does Life End? |
|||
Cause and Death |
|||
Murder |
|||
“Original” Murder: Killing with “Malice Aforethought” |
|||
Presumed Malice |
|||
Gradations of Murder |
|||
“First-Degree” Murder |
|||
“Second-Degree” Murder |
|||
The Model Penal Code Approach |
|||
Some Further Thoughts |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Felony Murder |
|||
Introduction |
|||
Restrictions on the Doctrine: “Cause” Questions |
|||
The “Proximate Cause” Theory |
|||
The “In Furtherance” (“Agency”) and “Provocative Act” Theories |
|||
Justified vs. Excused Killings |
|||
The Shield Cases: Exception to an Exception to an Exception |
|||
Other Restrictions |
|||
Duration of the Felony: Time Matters |
|||
Limitations on the Predicate Felony |
|||
Summary |
|||
Statutory Felony Murder: The Interplay of Courts and Legislatures |
|||
The Model Penal Code Approach |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Manslaughter |
|||
Voluntary Manslaughter |
|||
The Rules of Voluntary Manslaughter |
|||
Twentieth-Century Changes in the Doctrines |
|||
The Model Penal Code Approach |
|||
Involuntary Manslaughter |
|||
Reckless and Negligent Manslaughter |
|||
Misdemeanor-Manslaughter |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 9 Rape |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Common Law Approach |
|||
Definition |
|||
Spousal Immunity |
|||
Force |
|||
Threat of Force |
|||
Consent |
|||
Attacking the Credibility of the Complainant |
|||
Legally Ineffective Consent |
|||
Fraud |
|||
American Common Law |
|||
The Actus Reus of Rape |
|||
The Mens Rea of Rape |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Second-Degree Rape |
|||
First-Degree Rape |
|||
Gross Sexual Imposition |
|||
Modern Rape Statutes |
|||
Rape by Force or Threat of Serious Bodily Injury |
|||
Force |
|||
Additional Force |
|||
Inherent Force |
|||
Nonphysical Force |
|||
Dispensing with the Force Requirement |
|||
Threat of Force |
|||
Resistance by the Victim |
|||
Consent |
|||
Deception |
|||
Rape in the First Degree |
|||
Spousal Immunity |
|||
Rape Because No Legally Effective Consent |
|||
Summary |
|||
Evidence Reforms |
|||
The Corroboration Requirement |
|||
Rape Shield Laws |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 10 Theft |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Impact of History |
|||
The Death Penalty |
|||
Protecting Trade vs. Protecting Individualism |
|||
Larceny |
|||
Trespass |
|||
Asportation and Taking |
|||
Personal Property |
|||
Of Another |
|||
With Intent |
|||
To Deprive |
|||
Permanently |
|||
Contemporaneity |
|||
Finders |
|||
Embezzlement |
|||
Conversion |
|||
In Lawful Possession |
|||
Fraud |
|||
False Pretenses |
|||
Representation |
|||
Present or Past Fact |
|||
Title |
|||
Mens Rea, Knowledge, and Intent to Defraud |
|||
Puffing and Opinion |
|||
Confusion |
|||
Grading |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 11 Solicitation |
|||
Overview |
|||
Definition |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Another Version of Solicitation |
|||
The Mens Rea of Solicitation |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Actus Reus of Solicitation |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Relationship Between Solicitation and Conspiracy |
|||
Responsibility for Crime Solicited |
|||
Solicitation and Immunity for Crime Solicited |
|||
Solicitation and Innocent Agents |
|||
Impossibility |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Legal Impossibility |
|||
Factual Impossibility |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Abandonment |
|||
Solicitation and Law Enforcement |
|||
Punishment |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 12 Attempt |
|||
Overview |
|||
Definition |
|||
The Mens Rea of Attempt |
|||
The Actus Reus of Attempt |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Mens Rea |
|||
Intend the Act |
|||
Intend the Result |
|||
Intend the Circumstances |
|||
Actus Reus |
|||
Last Act |
|||
The Equivocality Test |
|||
Proximity Test |
|||
Probable Desistance |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Definition |
|||
Mens Rea |
|||
Conduct |
|||
Result |
|||
Circumstance |
|||
Actus Reus |
|||
Summary |
|||
Abandonment |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Impossibility: Legal, Factual, and Inherent |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Legal Impossibility |
|||
Factual Impossibility |
|||
Analysis |
|||
Inherent Impossibility |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Legal Impossibility |
|||
Factual Impossibility |
|||
Inherent Impossibility |
|||
Stalking |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 13 Conspiracy |
|||
Overview |
|||
Definition |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Punishment and Grading |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Special Advantages of Conspiracy for Prosecutors |
|||
Choice of Venue |
|||
Joint Trials |
|||
Use of Hearsay Evidence |
|||
Responsibility for Crimes Committed by Co-Conspirators |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Duration |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Extending the Life of a Conspiracy |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Consequences of Termination |
|||
The Mens Rea of Conspiracy |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Act and Result |
|||
Circumstances |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Conduct and Result |
|||
Circumstances |
|||
The Corrupt Motive Doctrine |
|||
The Crimmins Doctrine |
|||
Purpose or Knowledge When Providing Goods and Services |
|||
Case Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Actus Reus of Conspiracy |
|||
Agreement |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Overt Act |
|||
In General |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Scope of the Agreement or How Many Conspiracies? |
|||
Single Agreement with Multiple Criminal Objectives |
|||
Single or Multiple Agreements? |
|||
The Wheel and Spokes Approach |
|||
The Chain Approach |
|||
Wheel and Chain Conspiracies |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Parties to a Conspiracy |
|||
The Common Law’s Bilateral Approach |
|||
The Model Penal Code’s Unilateral Approach |
|||
Abandonment |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Withdrawal |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Impossibility |
|||
Legal Impossibility |
|||
Factual Impossibility |
|||
Wharton’s Rule |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Immunity for Substantive Offense |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 14 Complicity |
|||
Overview |
|||
The Rationale of Accomplice Liability |
|||
Definitions |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Procedural Consequences of Classification |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Contemporary Law |
|||
Elements of Accessorial Responsibility |
|||
Mens Rea |
|||
The Mens Rea of the Crime Aided |
|||
The Mens Rea to Be an Accomplice: Purpose or Intent to Aid the Principal’s Criminal Action |
|||
Knowledge That Another Intends to Commit a Crime |
|||
Providers of Goods and Services |
|||
Liability for Unintended Crimes Committed by the Principal |
|||
Actus Reus |
|||
Actual Assistance |
|||
Omission |
|||
How Much Aid Is Enough? |
|||
Immunity from Conviction |
|||
Conduct Necessarily Part of the Crime |
|||
Legal Incapacity to Commit Substantive Crime |
|||
The Relationship Between Principal and Accessories |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Requirement of a Guilty Principal |
|||
The Pretending Principal |
|||
Differences in Degree of Culpability Between Principal and Accomplice |
|||
Withdrawal of Aid |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Requirement of a Guilty Principal |
|||
The Pretending Principal |
|||
Differences in Degree of Culpability Between Principal and Accomplice |
|||
Withdrawal of Aid |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 15 Defenses: An Initial Survey |
|||
Overview |
|||
Presumptions |
|||
Constitutional Aspects of Presumptions |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
“Affirmative” Defenses |
|||
Legislative Clarity and the Offense-Defense Distinction |
|||
The Constitution and Affirmative Defenses |
|||
The Common Law and Affirmative Defenses |
|||
Excuse and Justification: The Debate and Confusion |
|||
The Distinction Drawn |
|||
The Distinction Questioned |
|||
The Problems with Explaining Justification |
|||
Mistake and Justification |
|||
Mistake: Honest or Reasonable? |
|||
Unknowing Justification: The Dadson Problem |
|||
The Problem with Explaining Excuses |
|||
Procedural Implications of the Distinctions |
|||
The Burden of Proof Problem |
|||
The Abolition Problem |
|||
The Assistance and Resistance Problem |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 16 Acts in Emergency: Justification vs. Excuse |
|||
Overview |
|||
Common Requirements, Common Problems |
|||
Actus Reus, Mens Rea, or Both? Or Neither? |
|||
Actus Reus |
|||
Mens Rea |
|||
Why Punish? |
|||
Duress |
|||
The Doctrines of Duress |
|||
Personal Injury |
|||
Source of the Threat |
|||
“Imminence” |
|||
Reasonableness of Fear |
|||
To “Himself” |
|||
Creating Conditions of Duress |
|||
Duress and Homicide |
|||
Termination of the Threat |
|||
The Guilt of the Duressor: A Note |
|||
The Rationale of Duress |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Necessity |
|||
The Doctrines of Necessity |
|||
Source of the Threat |
|||
Necessity and Homicide |
|||
The Problem of Imminence |
|||
Choice of Evils and Alternatives |
|||
Creating Conditions of Necessity |
|||
Excuse or Justification? |
|||
Duress vs. Necessity |
|||
The Problem of Democracy |
|||
Terrorists, Torture, and Necessity |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Self-Defense |
|||
The Rules of Self-Defense |
|||
Imminence; No Alternatives |
|||
Preemptive Strikes |
|||
To Retreat or Not to Retreat, That Is the Dilemma |
|||
“Stand Your Ground” Laws |
|||
Proportionality and Subjectivity |
|||
Mistake and Reasonableness |
|||
The Position of the “Aggressor”; Withdrawal |
|||
The “Not Unlawful” Aggressor |
|||
Time Frames |
|||
The Battered Wives Cases: A Challenge to the Doctrines |
|||
Doctrinal Problems of Self-Defense |
|||
The Mens Rea of Self-Defense |
|||
Defense of Others |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Provocation—Excuse or Justification? |
|||
Defense of Property and Habitat |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Other Lawful Means Available |
|||
Warning |
|||
Deadly Force Not Permitted |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Initial Aggression |
|||
Retaking Property |
|||
Use of Force |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Use of Force |
|||
Arrest |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Preventing Crime |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Chapter 17 Defenses Based on Individual Characteristics |
|||
Overview |
|||
Insanity |
|||
The Relevance of Mental Illness in the Criminal Justice System |
|||
Competency to Stand Trial |
|||
Transfer from Prison to a Psychiatric Hospital |
|||
Release from Confinement |
|||
Execution Pursuant to a Sentence of Death |
|||
The Insanity Defense |
|||
The M’Naghten Test |
|||
The Irresistible Impulse Test |
|||
The Model Penal Code Test |
|||
The Federal Insanity Test |
|||
Reform of the Insanity Defense |
|||
Substantive Changes |
|||
Procedural Changes |
|||
Insanity Defense Myths and Facts |
|||
The Guilty But Mentally Ill Defense |
|||
Historical Origin |
|||
Jury Options |
|||
Dispositional Consequences |
|||
Arguments Pro and Con |
|||
The Empirical Consequences of the GBMI Defense |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Infancy |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
Under Age 7 |
|||
Between Ages 7 and 14 |
|||
Over Age 14 |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Contemporary Law |
|||
Juvenile Court Jurisdiction |
|||
Criminal Responsibility |
|||
Example |
|||
Explanation |
|||
Intoxication |
|||
Intoxication as an Element |
|||
The Relevance of Voluntary Intoxication to Mens Rea or Culpability |
|||
The Common Law |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
The Relevance of Voluntary Intoxication to Defenses |
|||
Involuntary Intoxication |
|||
The Relevance of Voluntary Intoxication to Actus Reus |
|||
Alcoholism and Insanity |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Diminished Capacity |
|||
A Brief History |
|||
The British Version: Diminished Responsibility |
|||
The California Version |
|||
The Rule of Evidence Approach |
|||
The Model Penal Code |
|||
Summary |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Entrapment |
|||
The History of the Entrapment Defense |
|||
The Defense Today |
|||
The Subjective Approach |
|||
The Objective Approach |
|||
Due Process |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
New Excuses: The Future Is Upon Us |
|||
Physiologically (Biologically) Based Excuses for Criminality |
|||
Neuroscience and the Law—My Brain Made Me Do It |
|||
Genetics and Crime |
|||
Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) |
|||
Other Physiologically Based Claims |
|||
Psychologically Based Excuses |
|||
Brainwashing |
|||
Mob Mentality |
|||
Cognitive Psychology, Law and the Emotions |
|||
Sociologically Based Claims |
|||
Criminogenic Causes: Rotten Social Background |
|||
Urban Survival Syndrome and Black Rage |
|||
Recap |
|||
Examples |
|||
Explanations |
|||
Table of Cases |
|||
Index |